Chapter · Fees
Results, not fees.
So, what does this cost?
Potentially nothing.
Most advisers charge a management fee. Whether your portfolio goes up, down, or sideways, the fee is charged. I do not. If the strategy I run for you does not work in a given quarter, if it does not exceed a defined threshold, I am not paid for that quarter. When it does exceed the threshold, I am paid a share of the excess gain. That is the whole model.
In my own words
The wording below is copied exactly from my Form ADV, the brochure I file with regulators. The advisory agreement you sign sets the fee.
We do not charge asset-based management fees for our wealth management services. We charge a performance-based fee equal to 30% of the net gains (after transaction costs) in a Client's account that exceed both (i) the account's high-water mark and (ii) a cumulative hurdle rate of 1.5% per quarter.
What that means, in plain language
Two things have to be true before I am paid anything.
- 01
Your account has to reach a new high.
This is the high water mark. If your portfolio drops and later recovers, no fee is charged on the recovered ground, the water mark is the previous peak. I am not paid twice on the same gains.
The line is your portfolio value over time. Recovery to the previous peak charges no fee. Only gains above the peak count. - 02
The new high has to clear the hurdle, for that quarter.
This is the hurdle rate: 1.5% above the high water mark for each quarter since it was set. One quarter after a new high, the bar is 1.5%; after two quarters, 3.0%; after three, 4.5%. Small gains do not trigger a fee.
Two hypothetical quarterly scenarios, shown for the first quarter after a new high. An illustration of how the fee is calculated, not actual or projected results. Below the hurdle: no fee at all. Above: the fee applies only to the slice above the hurdle line.
When both conditions are met, the fee is 30% of the gains above the hurdle, net of transaction costs. Otherwise, there is no fee for that quarter.
Why the model is built this way
I built it this way so my incentives line up with yours. If you do well, I do well. If you do not do well, I do not do well. That is how I want the arrangement to work, and it is a large part of why the firm exists.
Want to see how this would apply to your portfolio? Start a conversation.
Start a conversation